Were the expectations clear?
The employee should be able to understand the required standard, the specific gap and how improvement will be measured. General statements such as 'not meeting expectations' are difficult to act on.
PERFORMANCE DISMISSAL
A PIP is supposed to test whether performance can improve — not manufacture a paper trail for a decision already made.
Performance dismissal is usually about sustained failure to meet reasonable job expectations after the employee has been told what the gap is and given a fair opportunity, support and time to improve. The detail of the performance process often decides whether the eventual dismissal is justified.
START WITH THE REAL ISSUE
What this situation actually means.
Employment New Zealand treats poor performance differently from misconduct. Performance management is ordinarily intended to identify the gap, support improvement and assess whether the employee can reach the required standard. Formal measures such as a PIP usually follow earlier efforts to address the issue, although the exact steps depend on the circumstances, agreement and policies.
There is no universal statutory formula for how long a PIP must run or exactly how many warnings must be given. A fair process is fact-specific. Role complexity, the nature of the performance issue, the support available, the employee's effort and progress, and any contractual procedure can all matter.
A performance process becomes vulnerable when targets move, measures are subjective or selectively applied, promised support is not supplied, the employee is assessed against work outside the role, or dismissal appears to have been selected before the improvement period has genuinely run its course.
WHAT MATTERS
Four things to check before deciding what the case is worth.
Was improvement realistically possible?
Timeframes should make sense for the role and the performance issue. Consider workload, training, systems, access to work and whether the employee had a genuine opportunity to demonstrate improvement.
Was the promised support actually delivered?
Training, coaching, examples, feedback or resources written into the plan should exist in practice, not merely on the document.
Did the employer assess the whole period fairly?
A fair assessment should consider progress and relevant context, not cherry-pick isolated mistakes while ignoring objective improvement or inconsistent expectations.
WHAT TO DO NOW
Keep the next steps practical.
Keep every version of the PIP
Save the original plan and any later changes to targets, measures, deadlines or responsibilities.
Build your own performance record
Keep completed work, metrics, positive feedback, training requests and examples showing whether expectations were met or changed.
Respond to review notes promptly
Correct factual errors in writing and identify support that was promised but missing.
Check the warning and dismissal sequence
Compare the process with your employment agreement, workplace policy and the reasons ultimately given for termination.
RED FLAGS
Facts that deserve a closer look.
- CHECK
Targets change after you meet the original ones
- CHECK
The PIP measures work that is not actually part of your role
- CHECK
You are denied work or resources needed to meet a target
- CHECK
Comparable employees are measured differently
- CHECK
The employer labels ordinary capability issues as misconduct
- CHECK
The outcome appears decided before the final review or before your response is considered
FAQ
Questions people ask in this situation.
Does an employer have to put me on a PIP before dismissal?
Not every performance case requires a document literally called a PIP, but Employment New Zealand describes formal performance measures, commonly a PIP, as the usual route after informal measures have not resolved the problem. The actual agreement, policy and circumstances matter.
How long should a performance improvement plan last?
There is no universal statutory number of weeks. The period should be reasonable for the role, the identified gap, the support available and the time genuinely needed to demonstrate improvement.
How many performance warnings are required?
There is no fixed statutory series in every case. Employment New Zealand says a series of warnings is generally the most appropriate approach in performance management because it gives the employee a fair chance to understand and correct the gaps.
Can my employer add new problems during a PIP?
New concerns can arise, but material new allegations or changed standards should be identified fairly. Constantly moving the goalposts can undermine whether the employee had a genuine opportunity to improve.
PERFORMANCE DISMISSAL
Want us to assess the actual documents?
Employee-side employment advocacy. No Win No Fee for suitable matters.